[
Home |
Articles |
Meetings |
NightTimes |
Dictionary |
Mentors |
Contacts |
Links |
Downloads
]
[Table of Contents | Back ]
A Publication of the
Lake County Astronomical Society
by Jack Kramer
Chapter 5 - More Optical Terminology
When you read ads that describe telescopes and optical components,
you'll be inundated with a host of technical jargon that indicates some
important apsects of the products. The following terms can be indicative of
optical quality, provided you know what they mean.
- Surface Accuracy
- Entire books have been devoted to the subject of
optical surface accuracy. This term is generally used (and mis-used) when
referring to the quality of telescope mirrors. It's stated in terms of a mirror
being accurate to 1/4 wave, 1/8 wave, 1/20 wave, etc. A 1/20 wave mirror is
more accurate than a 1/8 wave mirror, which is more accurate than a 1/4 wave.
But what does it mean? To say that a mirror is accurate to 1/20 wave means that
a beam of light does not vary by more than 1/20 the wavelength of light as a
result of being reflected by the surface of the mirror. That's a pretty small
amount! Let's use simpler terms: this simply means that the greater the surface
accuracy figure, the smoother is the surface of the mirror. But a mirror that's
accurate to 1/20 wave causes the error to double at the wavefront -
where the light comes to a focus. So the true error of a 1/20 wave mirror in
actual use is really 1/10 wave. Therefore, manufacturers prefer to tout their
measure of surface accuracy. As the accuracy decreases, more of the
light is scattered, instead of concentrating into the image at the focal point.
This is further complicated by the fact that in a reflector, you have more than
one mirror, so the accuracy can be further compromised if the other mirrors are
not sufficiently "smooth" or "flat". Various product reviews have shown that
the mirrors are often not nearly as accurate as their manufacturers claim. Part
of the problem is that there are several ways to measure this accuracy and many
users don't know how to test a mirror. The general criterion is that an optical
system - the whole telescope - should be accurate to at least 1/4 wave at the
point of focus. It's only under very high magnification that greater accuracy
becomes evident to most observers. (So it's handy to know how to star test your
telescope.) Simply bear in mind that if the surface accuracy of your mirror is
1/4 wave, then you're already in trouble at the wavefront! Lenses used in a
refractor also require high surface accuracy, but this is not as critical as in
a mirror.
- Mirror Thickness
- The traditional thickness ratio is 6:1 (diameter to
thickness). For example, a 12" mirror should be 2" thick, and an 8" mirror
should be 1.3" thick, etc. These are referred-to as "full thickness" mirrors.
If a mirror is thinner than the 6:1 ratio, it's a "lightweight" mirror. These
thinner mirrors aren't as stiff, but if properly supported, the flexure is
generally no worse than a full-thickness mirror. However, This lack of
stiffness does make them somewhat more difficult to grind; the result is that
surface accuracy is seldom as good as on a full-thickness mirror. Thin mirrors
have become popular in the last ten years because they're lighter in weight and
less expensive. In a Dobsonian telescope, the altazimuth motion reduces the
stress on the mirror and allows the use of a sling-type mirror mount.
- Annealing
- You may see the statement that certain mirrors are made of
"fine annealed" glass blanks. Annealing is the process of cooling the glass
during manufacture at a rate that allows the entire blank to solidify at a
uniform rate so that internal stresses are minimized. This directly affects the
ability of the polisher to make extremely accurate surfaces. There are three
grades of annealing - commercial, fine, and precision. Precision has the least
internal stress. The fine grade is considered more than adequate for a mirror
with a surface accuracy not exceeding 1/4 wave.
- Air-spaced or Cemented Lenses
- Many manufacturers point out that their
lenses are "air-spaced". This type of lens combination is more difficult to
make due to the especially critical nature of the alignment and matching of
optical elements. They're superior to lenses that are cemented together because
there's no foreign substance (the cement) to degrade the light transmission
over time
.
- Doublets, Triplets, etc.
- The problem with a simple lens is that when a
ray of light passes through it, the component colors come to a focus at
slightly different points. This results in fringes of color around bright
objects, known as "chromatic aberration". With a very long focal length, the
problem isn't as severe, but it becomes much more acute with shorter focal
ratios. By using two lenses of different glass (a "doublet"), the problem can
be minimized, though not totally corrected. These systems are referred to as
"achromats" and use one lens of crown glass and the other of flint glass.
"Apochromatic" lens systems were introduced widely in the mid 1980's; they
virtually eliminate chromatic aberration. These systems may employ three lenses
(a "triplet"), or a doublet system using fluorite glass or the newer "ED"
(enhanced dispersion) glass which do a better job of bringing all wavelengths
of light to the same focus. The problem with fluorite is that it's a softer
glass that can be damaged easily, so such a lens is always protected from
abrasion and exposure to the weather by being mounted as an internal element
within the telescope system. Some optical systems (such as Tele Vue's
Genesis) have a total of four elements in their objective lenses.
- Types of Glass
- Pyrex is intended for mirrors, but is not sufficiently transparent for use
as a lens. A lens or corrector plate requires rare earth glass or simply
"optical" glass. Flint glass contains lead and has a strong dispersion
level; it also has a slightly higher refractive index than crown glass.
Fluorite and ED are further types. Water white plate is another type that,
together with crown glass, is used for corrector plates in SCTs. Ceramic
glasses for mirrors, such as "Zerodur", have a lower coefficient of
expansion than Pyrex, which provides a more stable surface and less
distortion due to temperature fluctuations. These glasses are a blend of
crystalline structure with a normal glass structure. The material is first
made as a glass, then held at a given temperature that permits the
crystalline structure to develop. At a certain point, the temperature is
changed, which terminates the crystalline formation. Quartz and fused silica
mirror blanks have an internal structure that is totally crystalline, which
results in the very lowest expansion coefficient.
[Table of Contents | Back ]
Webmaster: webmaster@lcas-astronomy.org
[
Home |
Articles |
Meetings |
NightTimes |
Dictionary |
Mentors |
Contacts |
Links |
Downloads
]